3 min read

Taming the Chaos: How WIP Limits Transformed My Product Backlog

Team Members Managing their project tasks.

When I started my product journey, a college friend told me to read The Phoenix Project. The similarities between that fictional story and real life were uncanny. One concept that really stuck with me was Work in Progress (WIP) limits. Such a common-sense principle, yet most teams ignore it.

Our ERP Dev team was drowning in requests. The backlog kept growing, stakeholders wanted everything immediately, and work took forever to complete. The problem wasn't the backlog itself, we were letting in too much work at once.

That's when it hit me: Managing a backlog isn't just about prioritization, it's about controlling flow. WIP limits force teams to focus, reduce context switching, and actually deliver value faster.

Here's how applying WIP limits changed how I manage backlogs today.

What is Work in Progress (WIP) & Why Does It Matter?

In product development, WIP refers to the number of active items being worked on at any given time. The more WIP, the more fragmented attention becomes—and the longer everything takes to complete.

I think of it like playing Tapper, this arcade game I loved as a kid.

You play a bartender in an old-school saloon, serving endless customers demanding drinks. You pour a draft, slide it down the bar, and rush to the next customer before they get impatient. But when too many customers show up at once, you fall behind. Unfinished drinks pile up, customers get angry, and suddenly—you're overwhelmed and it's game over.

This is exactly what happens when a product team takes on too much at once. Instead of making steady progress, unfinished work accumulates, quality suffers, and everything slows down.

The Hidden Costs of High WIP

  • Slower Delivery: More work in progress means longer cycle times
  • Lower Quality: More multitasking leads to more mistakes
  • Stakeholder Frustration: Half-done work sitting around makes leadership impatient
  • Feature Bottlenecks: Developers get stuck waiting on dependencies

Less WIP = More Focus, Faster Delivery.

How WIP Limits Improve Backlog Flow

Setting WIP limits creates a pull-based system, where work moves forward only when capacity is available. Instead of overwhelming teams, they work in smaller, manageable batches.

Why It Works:

  • Forces Clear Prioritization: If teams can only handle a set number of tasks, stakeholders must decide what's truly important
  • Reduces Bottlenecks: Engineers and designers aren't waiting on half-finished work
  • Speeds Up Delivery: Small batches flow through the system faster than large, overloaded queues
  • Prevents Overcommitment: Helps teams set realistic expectations with leadership

Setting Effective WIP Limits for Your Backlog

Not all WIP limits work the same. The right limits depend on your team's workflow.

  1. Set WIP Limits Based on Capacity A 5-person Scrum team might have a WIP limit of 5-7 active stories at a time. Kanban teams should set WIP limits per workflow stage (e.g., "In Progress" cannot exceed 4 tasks).
  2. Use a Pull-Based System Don't start new work until existing work is completed. This prevents backlog bloat and keeps focus on finishing what's already started.
  3. Regularly Adjust WIP Limits If work keeps getting stuck, reduce WIP limits. If team members sit idle, loosen WIP limits slightly.

Rethinking Backlog Management as Flow Optimization

A backlog isn't merely an inventory of tasks, it's a living system that requires careful cultivation. The discipline of WIP limits has transformed my approach to product development by making visible what was previously hidden: the cost of trying to do everything at once.

What I've found most surprising is how limiting work actually accelerates delivery. It seems counterintuitive until you experience it firsthand. Projects that once stretched for months now find their way to completion in weeks. Features ship with fewer defects. Team conversations shift from status updates to solving meaningful problems.

There's an unexpected benefit too—psychological safety improves when teams aren't constantly overcommitted. People feel empowered to do quality work rather than just checking boxes. They become more engaged when they can see their impact clearly.

The journey toward better flow is never complete. Each team discovers its unique rhythm and constraints. The real power comes not from blindly applying rules, but from nurturing a culture that values completion over busyness, quality over quantity, and thoughtful prioritization over reactive scrambling.

This post contains affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

© 2025 Tales of Product. All rights reserved.